Judicial Tyranny Pt. 4. Democrats, Comey, & Weaponized Robes: Exposing Progressive Insurrection And Rallying Republicans To Save Our Republic

By all Constitutional standards and in every sense of the word, President Trump is a true American patriot and, in the spirit of Patrick Henry’s quintessential “Give me liberty or give me death” speech, a real “Freedom Fighter.” 

Indeed, a natural born leader who by all accounts is:

1)— Very much like our Founding Fathers… the 56 trailblazing pioneers, heroes, and signers of the Declaration of Independence who risked and pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor for our Rights and Freedoms, for the enduring hope of a free Republic, a Republic that they created.

And:

2)— Very much unlike Progressive politicians who, in truth, are nothing more than rabid, Cultural Marxist manipulators, disguised as Social Justice Warriors, who—contrary to the brainwashed or whatever their latest “We Care” “Be Good” tagline or catchphrase is—are, in point of fact, motivated by raw power which feeds their empty, passionately despotic souls and drives their need to, as Barack Obama declared, fundamentally transform America into a One-Party Administrative State, effectively destroying our Republic. 

A Republic born not from the chains of Government Dependency, but from the Principles of Self-Governance, Self-Determination, and Freedom—anchored in our Inalienable Right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, and tempered in the Unassailable Ideal of Justice: Impartial, Fair, and Blind, meted out equally to every American without fear or favor.

A Republic that our Founding Fathers, meticulously crafted and framed our Founding Documents—the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land—for, to stand as a bulwark against tyranny, guaranteeing to “We the People” that those very Principles and Rights be secured through a Government that was instituted among men that was "Of, By, and For the People,” deriving its just powers from the consent of the people… the governed.

Ergo, it is not merely the Right, but the Solemn Duty of every red-blooded American to demand and expect:

1)— That the Legislative Branch—our elected Representatives and Senators—create laws that safeguard those principles and rights, not abridge or breach them.

2)— That the Judicial Branch—Judges—interpret the law, the United States Constitution as written, and not exploit it as a means and/or tool to either advance their personal ideological beliefs or protect their political allies.

3)— That the Executive Branch—the President and Officers of the Executive Branch, which includes Prosecutors—“Take Care” that all the laws are faithfully executed and enforced through the Equal Application of the Law,” rigorously, proving their cases beyond all reasonable doubt.

While: 

4)— We the People—Defendants—are afforded our Due Process Rights to not only confront and challenge our accusers but also to defend and dismantle any and all claims, evidence, and/or actions leveled against us… 

Anything less would be a betrayal of the very Principles that this Republic was founded, built, and stands on—and a desecration of the blood, sweat, and tears spilled to defend and protect her!

However, that said, here we are 250 years later, in the “No one is above the law” era of Democrat irony, hypocrisy, and moral preening—in the land of the free and the home of the brave, where the American people naïvely expect prosecutors to prosecute, and judges to actually judge based on, you know, pesky little things like evidence and the law—and we find ourselves in yet another twisted tale in which judges—tasked as the “Gatekeepers of our Constitution”—are now committed to Judicial Defiance of the law over Judicial Deference for the law, supplanting Judicial Restraint with Judicial Activism.

This time, in the case of United States v. James B. Comey Jr. in the State of Virginia. 

A case that will inevitably go down in history as a scathing rebuke, indictment, and exposé of our Judicial Branches plunge into the partisan political world of Progressive rot, corruption, and Judicial Tyranny, fueling the Democrats relentless push toward Marxism, toward a One-Party Administrative State, and the betrayal of our Republic’s Founding Principles. 

Suffice it to say, as the story goes, in this particular case, or moreover progressive pageantry of judicial tyranny, as many are aware, on September 25th, 2025, after careful deliberation, a federal grand jury in the State of Virginia voted to indict former FBI Director James Comey on two felony counts. 

However—as a matter of predictable, Blue State, judicial course—only for three Democrat-anointed Activist Judges, Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff, Judge Cameron McGowan Currie, and Magistrate Judge William G. Fitzpatrick, to swoop in like caped crusaders for the Deep State, perverting the law in order to deliberately shred the indictment against Comey in what can only be construed as a politically motivated effort to protect James Comey—by all accounts, the epitome of a Deep Stater operative, who, after being tasked with upholding the law, instead, opted to weaponize it in the name of political vengeance, Progressive favor, and partisan power. 

Indeed, Judges Nachmanoff, McGowan Currie, and Fitzpatrick’s unprecedented, legally dubious decision to overturn the grand jury’s verdict and shred the indictment against Comey wasn’t made in error, rather, it was, amongst other unlawful things, a calculated betrayal of the 14th Amendment’s equal application of the law clause, not to mention, a seething example of judicial insurrection and tyranny. 

Their adjudication was not only founded on:

1)— Baseless, biased suppositions laced with vile conjecture.

2)— A toxic dependence on Left-wing media propaganda, riddled with outright lies.

And

3)— Procedural sleights-of-hand that brazenly defied and mocked every precedent in federal criminal law.

But also:

4)— In brazen violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, where the aforementioned judges unleashed vicious attacks, smears, and baseless accusations against Lindsey Halligan—the steadfast U.S. Attorney prosecuting the sniveling, corrupt weasel James Comey—simply because her unyielding Constitutional Conservative principles clashed with their rabid Progressive Marxist ideology.

Madison wrote in Federalist 47, "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether one, a few, or many... may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."

And, hands down, at no other time in history has Madison’s words proved more prophetic than they do today, as evidenced by the Democrat’s strategic use or exploitation of our Judiciary in or with what amounts to the advent and rise of modern-day JUDICIAL TYRANNY via the implementation, or, at least, the attempted implementation of arbitrary, heavy-handed Progressive rulings that have and continue to be spawned by unelected, cherry-picked, Activist Judges in Blue States and/or Districts who are not only determined to help the Left pervert our legal system in an effort to affect policy, in order to effect ideological change, and ultimately cement the Democrat's Progressive Marxist agenda but also to shield Progressive politicians and their entrenched Deep State cronies.

In the United States v. James B. Comey Jr.

1)— Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff

An Obama appointee and stooge, who—being a shining, emblematic example of Left-wing judicial rot and tyranny—in a deliberate act of TDS enmity toward Trump and animosity toward Constitutional Conservatives writ large—echoing numerous other Left-wing judicial thugs and tyrants of his ilk, who have transformed Blue State courthouses into dens of iniquity, butchering our “5th Amendment’s Due Process  Rights” and our “14th Amendment’s Equal Protection and Application Guarantees—launched this political salvage operation to protect and prevent James Comey from facing charges and accountability for his crimes, by framing and branding U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan as a “Stalking horse or a puppet for want of a better word, doing the president’s bidding?”

Without question, a vile insinuation not only fabricated from whole cloth to publicly insult, discredit, and humiliate Ms. Halligan, but one that also betrayed every canon of judicial neutrality. 

What’s more, Nachmanoff, in violation of Canon 3—strictly forbidding judges from relying on media drivel over evidentiary facts—referenced news reports as the factual basis for his ruling, ultimately shaping his skepticism toward the DOJ’s independence, whilst deliberately shunning bona fide objective material evidence that, in point of fact, contradicted his claims.

Additionally, while indulging and granting the Deep Stater’s defense counsel free rein, he not only relentlessly interrupted Halligan but when she dared to correct his factual distortions of grand-jury events, he, in a grotesque display of raw contempt and prejudice, silenced her with a curt, compelling her to file a NOTICE CORRECTING THE RECORD to combat his deliberate misrepresentations of grand-jury events.

Worst of all, Nachmanoff, based on his personal prejudgment of prosecutorial independence—in other words, political opinion, and not a finding based on evidence or law—declared that he would find it difficult to credit Halligan’s prosecutorial independence even if she, as an officer of the court, asserted it under oath… 

Suffice it to say, this wasn’t a judicious judgment in the legal sense or any sense for that matter, rather, it was:

A)— Judicial arrogance mirroring that of many other Progressive Activist Judges, who, over the last year—at the unspoken behest of the Democrat Marxist Regime—have issued an unprecedented number of unconstitutional nationwide injunctions against Trump, in a malicious effort to usurp his Constitutionally mandated Executive Branch Powers without the requisite Article III Constitutional Authority to do so.

And 

B)— Premeditated sabotage, an egregious violation of judicial impartiality that erodes the very bedrock foundation of our judicial system.

2)— Judge Cameron McGowan Currie:

A Clinton-era relic who, compounding the outrage—parachuted in from South Carolina via unexplained “designation”—dismissed the indictment outright in a diatribe dripping with malice. Not only vilifying but undermining Halligan’s legal qualifications as nothing more than “A White House aide who has no prosecutorial experience…” in what was nothing more than an ad hominem smear presented as a judicial ruling, that, in truth, was clearly crafted to belittle and discredit rather than to adjudicate.

Indeed, the essence of judicial tyranny—unelected partisans wielding their robes as ideological weapons. 

Additionally, as with Nachmanoff, Currie also ignored the actual facts of the case, relying on, prioritizing, and elevating press propaganda and speculation over sworn testimony, evidence, and the law as the factual basis for her ruling—a flagrant ethical violation that once again fuels public distrust in our judiciary.

What’s more, to arrive at her ruling, Currie contradicted her own cited precedent from United States v. Calandra, “The validity of an indictment is not affected by the character of the evidence..."—She then went on to dismiss the indictment based precisely on the character of the evidence and her own distrust of the process.

Hypocrisy incarnate… what say you? 

The fact of the matter is, as most with a rudimentary understanding of the law would agree, there is no legal, much less earthly explanation that could possibly justify Currie’s appointment to adjudicate this case—as a judge perched hundreds of miles outside and utterly disconnected from the case’s rightful state, district, and/or venue—which not only raises red flags about systemic judicial political bias but also sets off five-alarm warnings about corrupt forum and judge shopping.

3)— Magistrate Judge William G Fitzpatrick:

A Biden-era puppet whose antics and rulings represent the pinnacle of judicial rot being forged from altered transcripts, fabricated suspicions, and a debunked missing minutes theory or farce—obviously, all to torpedo a valid indictment. 

Fitzpatrick deliberately butchered grand-jury instructions by splitting one continuous statement into two parts, thereby not only creating a meaning or context not present in the actual text and then inventing misconduct where none existed, but also omitting the dispositive portion of the instructions proving Halligan’s correctness. 

Halligan’s filings rightly decried Fitzpatrick’s findings as “Unsound” and “Distorted”—a polite understatement for what, in truth, amounts to outright judicial fraud whereby Fitzpatrick built his ruling around conjecture, no evidence, and a deliberately forged record.

His missing minutes delusion—alleging a suspicious gap between 4:28 p.m. and 6:47 p.m.—was demolished by the court reporter’s sworn confirmation that it was merely untranscribed deliberation time. Nevertheless, despite knowing that grand juror deliberations are never ever recorded, Fitzpatrick continued to peddle the lie that the gap was evidence of misconduct. 

As such, deliberately and manipulatively exploiting his contrived claims of misconduct as fact, Fitzpatrick then cunningly ordered the unprecedented disclosure of all grand-jury materials, including audio recordings, in an extraordinary breach of grand-jury secrecy that was later stayed for its utter baselessness. 

However, in typical “I am above the law” Left-wing fashion—believing that the rules don’t apply to him as a Democrat—Fitzpatrick overstepped the aforementioned stay, and reopened the inquiry like the lawless rogue inquisitor that he clearly is.

The fact is, the grand jury’s intent couldn't have been clearer as the notice correcting the record illustrates: “We… want to true bill Counts Two and Three.” 

However, the aforementioned Democrat despots donning the Black Robe—which is supposed to symbolize simplicity, impartiality, and the idea that “Justice is Blind”—not only ignored the jury’s verdict, arguably working harder than the actual defense itself to dismantle it, but in doing so, and in more ways than one, knowingly violated the Canons of Judicial Conduct.

By volunteering unfounded theories, suspicions, and obstacles that the defense then adopted, by misstating the return, by falsely alleging nonexistent misconduct, by  manipulating evidence and instructions, by relying on and prioritizing media reports over actual evidence, by dismissing the indictment without addressing the evidence, and by engaging in a malicious smear campaign against the U.S. Attorney prosecuting the case, Judges Nachmanoff, McGowan Currie, and Fitzpatrick’s explicitly breached amongst others:

1)— Judicial Canon 2(A)— “An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances disclosed by a reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge’s honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is impaired.”

And 

2)— Judicial Canon 1—which requires judges to uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.

3)— Judicial Canon 3(A)(4)—which effectively requires that judicial decisions and findings in a proceeding be based solely on the official record and evidence presented according to law, without considering external influences such as unauthorized ex parte communications, one-sided discussions, or other outside inputs like media reports that aren’t part of the formal process. 

4)— Judicial Canon 3—which mandates that judges perform their duties with respect for others, and should not engage in behavior that is harassing, abusive, prejudiced, or biased.

The fact of the matter is, the indictment did not fail, and the case did not collapse due to evidentiary weakness, AG Pam Bondi, or Lindsey Halligan—the steadfast U.S. Attorney prosecuting the case; rather, it collapsed due to judicial bias. This wasn’t impartial adjudication or Judicial Review; it was the dismantling of our justice system, a betrayal of the American people by Progressive Activist Judges weaponizing the bench to thwart accountability to protect their political pals and advance the Democrat Regime’s Progressive Marxist Agenda. 

With that in mind, I strongly, and with all due respect and kindness, urge my fellow Republicans—particularly those who may feel inclined to point accusatory fingers at our own side—to hit pause, dig into the hard facts just a little deeper, and then redirect your fury and frustrations toward Democrats before our Party is torn apart.

Please know, I mean no offense toward anyone in the Conservative movement; I’m simply laying out the unvarnished, raw truth with the passion it deserves, which I hope helps us all recognize not only who the real enemies are here, but also what the real challenge is as we head toward the midterms: Democrats have turned our judiciary into a toxic swamp, a weapon that they are exploiting, not only to poison justice but also to, in effect, affect policies one partisan ruling and injunction at a time!

The only way our Republic can survive is to stop judicial tyranny and the only way to stop judicial tyranny is for Republicans to win the midterms. The only way for Republicans to win the midterms is for the Republican Electorate to UNIFY, to GOTV, and gain Congressional SUPERMAJORITIES, more importantly, in the Senate, so we can impeach and remove all Activist Judges—judicial tyrants—who, with impunity, are not only acting as Judges, but also as Jurors, Executioners, Legislators, and Presidents.

If Republicans continue to sow seeds of division amongst our own, Democrats will win, and if they win, our Republic as it was founded, and as we know it, ends.

Linda Genzel. Editor @WECU News.